Defining Quality and Leadership
How reflection can be the key to unlocking your team.
In my last article in February’s issue of CLM Magazine, “Avoiding ‘Who’s to Blame?’: Moving From a Fault-Finding Mission to a Quality and Leadership Review,” we discussed quality and leadership without a firm definition. In my travels, when the phrase “quality product” and “leadership” were discussed, it was done so without any background. So, before we go further, let’s look into acceptable definitions.
The Business Dictionary describes quality as, “In manufacturing, a measure of excellence or a state of being free from defects, deficiencies, and significant variations. It is brought about by strict and consistent commitment to certain standards that achieve uniformity of a product in order to satisfy specific customer or user requirements.” The ISO 8402-1986 standard defines quality as “the totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bears its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.” If an automobile company finds a defect in one of its cars and makes a product recall, then customer reliability (and production) will decrease because trust will be lost in the car’s quality.
Those of us in insurance are in the business of “manufacturing” a legal document. Because of this, I believe the key for claims quality is the characteristic of a product or service that bears its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs. This leads us to two types of reviews. If you have the luxury of using quantitative analysis, then the use of an in-depth checklist is invaluable. You can see claims managers’ actions, such as the span between reserving and paying, represented in the data. This is useful in identifying training issues as well as determining who should get what kind of file. This approach was described in our article, “Implementing Predictive Analytics for Claims Management,” in the April 2014 issue of Claims Management magazine.
The second type of review is qualitative. Instead of an in-depth checklist, the management team determines what constitutes quality. Examples would include questions like:
- What constitutes a quality coverage determination? Is the policy in the file? Did the claims handler describe the applicable coverage? Is the insured the named insured? Does the rest of the review follow the same reasoning?
- Is there a good investigation in the file? Can you tell who was responsible for the accident? What started the fire?
- How about the evaluation? Can you determine why the reserve is set where it is? Is it reasonable? Is it reasonable that the claim will settle for a similar amount?
The advantage to this approach is flexibility. If you have an experienced claims handler and need to cross-train, then this approach is very effective. The claims handler understands the basics but needs a technical understanding. His technical aspects can be created as a quality module and the work can be evaluated in terms of the final product and the questions asked.
Previously, we also discussed quality leadership, but we did not define leadership in a claims environment. If you ask someone in a leadership position what leadership is, then you will get as many answers as the number of people asked. My favorite leadership description was given by Alexis Davis, founder and designer of Hoo-Kong by Alexis Davis, in a Business News Daily article: “My perspective of a leader is an individual who knows the ins and outs about the business so they can empathize with followers. In addition to being a positive influence on the people they are leading, leadership is about setting the tone, motivating, inspiring, thinking big, and never [giving] up when others feel like quitting.”
However, there is another aspect to leadership in our industry. In many cases, claims handling, leadership, and stress go hand in hand in hand. There are thousands of books and articles on how to handle stress, so let’s not add another here. However, there are a few useful tips. It helps to control your breathing, maintain a positive attitude, and look for solutions instead of placing blame. It is useful to go back to some of the attributes of your quality training. Look for a win/win scenario.
If you are in a supervisory position, then look for the good before pointing out the bad. Choose your words carefully, and when you feel you cannot maintain this approach, seek guidance. It is amazing how situations can look different from another person’s perspective. If you are serious about improving your leadership style, then conduct a self-audit. A good leadership audit is imperative to good claims handling. Our days seem to be composed of putting one fire out after another, but if you stop and reflect on how you handled the last fire, then the next may be easier to put out. If you develop a habit of self-reflection, then you will be more approachable when claims handlers who report to you have a stressful situation of their own.